What’s Actually the Plane of the Future
Articles Blog

What’s Actually the Plane of the Future

August 26, 2019


This video was made possible by Squarespace. Build your web presence for 10% by going to
squarespace.com/wendover. Supersonic speed, modular cabin design, all
electric power, transparent cabin walls, pilotless planes, personal jets for everyone—that
all sounds great, but what’s actually the plane of the future. In the next 15-20 years, what will be the
next major aircraft release to make an impact on the industry? Well, it’s not nearly as exciting as those
concepts, at least for passengers. More and more people travel by plane each
year and the industry is only growing. In recent years the Boeing 787 Dreamliner
has made a significant impact on the airline industry. This relatively small, super-efficient, long
range airplane has allowed for the advent of long-haul budget airlines and for traditional
airlines to open up long-haul routes between smaller markets. Now, the near-future of aviation has a lot
to do with one decision Boeing made almost a decade ago—a decision they’ve been regretting
ever since. In 1983 the first Boeing 757 entered into
service with Eastern Airlines. It was billed as a replacement to the successful
727 for popular shorter routes that needed more seats than a 737. At the time it was incredibly fuel efficient
burning 40% less fuel per seat than its predecessor. It sold well, but not phenomenally. By the turn of the millennium about a thousand
were made and sales were slowing rapidly so Boeing pulled the plug on the aircraft’s
production in 2004. But then, in 2007, the aircraft started to
be used for something it wasn’t intended for—transatlantic service. When the 757 was originally developed airlines
weren’t really allowed to fly twin-engine aircraft over long stretches of ocean, but
the regulations changed so airlines changed how they used the plane. With a range of well over 4,000 miles, the
757 can easily reach most destinations in western Europe from the US east coast. When operating a smaller plane, airlines are
almost guaranteed that they can fill the seats so they’re almost guaranteed to make money. So, instead of operating larger planes that
might not fill up, airlines started flying this single-aisle, twin-engine plane across
the Atlantic. The smaller size also allowed airlines to
fly to smaller destinations with smaller demand. United, for example, flies this plane on routes
like New York to Shannon, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Lisbon, and Stockholm. At the same time, since the plane was originally
developed for domestic routes, it can easily be used for shorter domestic flights between
transatlantic flights which leads to high aircraft utilization—a key to profitability. But these planes are getting old. Some have been in service for well over 30
years and airlines need to retire them to remain competitive both with passenger comfort
and with aircraft efficiency and right now, nobody really knows what’s going to replace
these aging 757’s. There’s a huge gap in the market. The biggest Boeing single aisle aircraft in
production is the 737 Max 10 while the smallest twin-aisle aircraft is the 787-8 Dreamliner. In an all economy configuration the Max 10
carries 230 passengers while the Dreamliner carries 359 passengers. Meanwhile, the Max 10 can fly up to 3,700
miles while the Dreamliner can fly up to 8,300 miles. At between 230 and 280 passengers and up to
4,000 nautical miles, the 757 perfectly fits between the two sizes, but we need a plane
of the future for this middle spot. Neither Boeing or Airbus has officially announced
plans for a middle of the market plane but it’s almost certain that the next entirely
new plane to hit the market will be in this sweet spot of size. Boeing tried to hurriedly make a plane this
size with the 737-MAX program but many traditional airlines aren’t buying it. Budget airlines love using it to serve between
the British Isles and US east coast, but the largest 737-MAX can only fly up to 3,700 miles—only
barely reaching continental Europe from New York. United, Delta, and American Airlines all want
a longer-range and slightly larger plane for their low-demand transatlantic routes. So here’s the good news: this plane is coming. There have only been trickles of information,
but we’ve all but confirmed that the Boeing 797 will be a brand new plane between the
size of the 737 and the 787 and here’s what it will look like. It will have between 225 and 260 seats and
a range of just shy of 6,000 miles—enough to get even to the American west coast from
London. While the increased range of the 737-Max planes
is allowing transatlantic service from smaller cities in the British Isles and American east
coast, this 797 will open transatlantic service from cities deeper into the continents along
with replacing the aging 757s. With super-efficient engines and composite
design, it will be one of the most efficient planes yet and further drive down the cost
of hopping the pond. Meanwhile, Airbus is doing nothing, because
they already tried. The Airbus a310 was exactly the size of this
potential 797 but they only sold 250 of them. It was likely before its time—airlines just
didn’t consider serving long-haul routes between smaller markets at the time. It’s a newer concept. Ironically, the best replacement for the Boeing
757 is actually an Airbus plane—the a321 neo long range—but this plane is a bit too
small to serve as a true replacement. It’s more a temporary solution until Boeing
releases their solution. As of now the 797 would most likely enter
service in 2025 so it will be a while until we know which manufacturer chose correctly. But what’s next? After completing their entire ranges of aircraft
sizes, what will Boeing and Airbus make to remain competitive? Right now oil prices are low so there’s
less pressure to operate greener aircraft, but most analysts predict a doubling of oil
prices in the next 20-30 years with ever faster increases after that. The industry will need to adapt to stay alive
against the potential future threat of high-speed land-based transportation systems like hyperloop. For that, electric is the answer. Fuel is airlines’ number one cost and cutting
that out could make flying competitive in price to taking the bus, but electric aircraft
have their limitations. Current batteries are heavy and electric engines
are weak so electric aircraft are limited in speed and range, but there’s a place
for that kind of aircraft—on regional routes. Trains currently dominate the 200-400 mile
transportation market. Think DC to New York, Edinburgh to London,
or Tokyo to Osaka. There’s just no way that the plane can beat
the train in terms of price, convenience, and time, but the electric aircraft has the
potential to beat the train on the most important of those three factors—price. By offering a transportation option at roughly
the same cost but significantly faster than the bus, electric aircraft will have the potential
to dominate the short-haul market because on shorter routes, aircraft speed doesn’t
really matter. On flights so short, aircraft barely get up
to their top speeds. Both British Airways and Flybe operate the
Edinburgh to London Heathrow route, for example, but British Airways uses a320 and 767 jets
while Flybe uses Bombardier Dash 8 turboprops. British Airways flies this route in an average
79 minutes while Flybe, with their slower turboprop planes flies between Edinburgh and
London Heathrow in a faster 73 minutes on average. British Airways’ a320 has a top speed of
541 mph while Flybe’s dash 8 has a top speed of 370 miles per hour and yet the turboprop
flies the route faster. On such a short route, the low speed of an
electric airplane wouldn’t matter since aircraft can’t get up to speed and the dramatic
cost reduction would make airplanes the absolute dominant transportation method in short-haul
markets. Airbus is the current market leader in electric
aircraft development with a goal to release a hybrid commuter aircraft by 2030, but as
the reality of a world without oil nears, Boeing will likely start more serious development
of an electric aircraft in the coming years. None of this is to say that we will never
see some of the more exciting future aircraft concepts, but the entire aviation industry
is dictated by economics, not comfort. It’s a lot easier for airlines to market
lower prices than it is for them to sell higher comfort so more efficient aircraft will always
win. With the completion of a middle-of-the-market
airplane, however, the entire range of aircraft sizes will be filled in a way that might allow
the aircraft manufacturers to turn their focus to developing more novel aircraft concepts
that will change the way we fly in the future. The good news is that these aircraft developments
are all about making flying cheaper which will let more and more people fly for less. If you have a business, a youtube channel,
a podcast, or really anything else, you need a professional web presence. It’s how people find you nowadays, and nobody
makes it easier to build your website than squarespace. They have dozens of beautiful designer templates
that make it simple to make a beautiful looking website. You can create an e-store, a blog, a portfolio,
or just a simple landing page with your contact info. If anything goes wrong, they have fantastic,
award-winning customer service available 24/7. No matter how you use squarespace, you can
get 10% off your order by going to squarespace.com/wendover. Squarespace is what I use because it just
works and you should to by going to squarespace.com/wendover. Aside from that, please be sure to check out
my podcast Showmakers, my new channel Half as Interesting, and subscribe to this channel
to get all my future videos right when they come out. Thanks again for watching and I’ll see you
in two weeks for another Wendover Productions video.

Only registered users can comment.

  1. Hey I hope you enjoy this new video! Some 370 of you got to see this early as I accidentally pressed the button that I didn't mean to press so the video was live for about a minute this morning, but here's the real version!

    Make sure to check out Squarespace because this video literally would not have happened without their support.

  2. Future of aviation?
    I think if they can better the 787/A350 then no new aircraft will appear soon.
    If they can return an aircraft similar to Concorde then no new aircraft will surprise me

  3. I think Boeing should be shut down due to safety reasons. I mean not even the Dreamliner is safe anymore and this shitty Yankee company are obviously to retarded to care about safety.

  4. Most important thing is to have couchettes in the economy class of transatlantic flights. Everything else is gravy.

  5. Boeing is working on FAA certification that will only require 1 pilot In each plane… more automation – less human intervention

  6. Round Winged Airplanes,
    Flying Saucer if your not familiar,
    Best thing about them they don't fall out of the sky like a Rock.

  7. Airbus is doing nothing? Isn't A350 ULR flying the longest flight right now? Singapore to Newark?? This guy is a Boeing cock sucker.

  8. Planes will never trump short-range transportation until airports become more efficient. It doesn't matter how fast/cheap the plane is if you can get to your destination by train before the alternative flight even leaves.

  9. Electric, commercial, airplane is a BS concept since batteries contain all componentes to create, valotile, explosion reaction. Carosine doesn't explode unless it is mixed with, outside taken, oxigen in proper proportions. Usually, we see an airplane aflame and people walking away, safely. With the battery, this whole thing would explode in mid air like we see in Hollywood movies.

  10. Yes, it is true more efficient economically. That's why the space between seats becomes smaller and smaller. And hope that gay who talking about efficiency will fly straight up his feet and pay for this fortune.

  11. Anything that costs more than 10 cents to operate will not happen. For the past 30 years, for passengers, the airlines have been going backwards. High speed rail is desperately needed in the U.S.

  12. At this point in time Airbus is the only option for planes – one shouldn't even be thinking about Boeing.

    In my opinion the only good planes Boeing ever made are the 767 and the 777

  13. Time traveler: hey send over productions how’s the 737 max

    WP: well it’s the newest and greatest single aisle plane of 2019

    Time traveler: oh so it’s before the crashes

    WP: … ummm what

  14. 6:25 your video production skills are great,but all you need is a small bit of research to figure hyperloop is impossible.

  15. After all the 737 max issues, Boeing was forced to cancel the 797 program. So airbus decided to announce their a321neo ultra long range which fits perfect in that gap. Airbus is expected to pass Boeing as the largest airplane manufacturer in the world.

  16. What the hell is this? A Boeing add? The way Boeing is going, with their complete lack of respect to safety as opposed to their bottom line, I see Airbus as the future of airplanes.

  17. Electric planes are the future of aircraft life. We are going to run out of oil soon. And once we start to get low on it. The price will skyrocket.

    ⚠️THEORY ⚠️ Elon musk will began making fully electric tesla airplanes in probaly 2030 maybe later.

  18. Lol, ive travelled between Edinburgh and London and let me tell you its way easier to fly. Saves roughly 3 hours, and i paid an extra 20% because rail fares are so expensive and I actually get a seat.

  19. "What's Actually the Plane of the Future". Is there an American YouTuber in existence who understands the fucking English language?

  20. Well the tables have turned. Airbus is selling its A220s (aka the Bombardier C series) well, and Boeing is in a lot of trouble after its 737 Max issue. Taking this all into account, it seems that Airbus is the future.

  21. For pilots the 757 replacement is very exiting because you can only make so much money with the 737 and the 767 or 787 can be combersome

  22. Airbus has gotten there first. A321neo XLR released. Bigger cabin than 757, 500 nm more range than 757, 30 percent less fuel burned than the 757. Boeing gotta catch up.

  23. half or one or two meter wide hull to reduce drag air resistance and passangers lie down , would it be better for fuel economy, or sit half reclined packed like sardines in thin seats.but then legs must be bent a bit down or could they come between nest persons legs through crotch, one leg

  24. whats actually the plane of the future?: , better fuel efficiency, 6 inches less legroom and crappier airplane food

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *